vinced33 Posted October 21, 2004 Share Posted October 21, 2004 Salut a tous apres le topic d'uptime de Dark26 en voici un ptit nouveau Quelle est votre hdparm? hdparm -t </dev/hdx>ou</dev/sdx Pour que cela soit concret ne le faite pas quand vos disques sont utilisés cela va de soit et veuillez mettre la config de vos disques. allez c'est parti je vous met les miens des que mes disques sont libre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gauret Posted October 21, 2004 Share Posted October 21, 2004 Allez, encore un topic où je vais me faire ridiculiser # hdparm -t /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing buffered disk reads: 66 MB in 3.18 seconds = 20.77 MB/sec # hdparm -t /dev/hdb /dev/hdb: Timing buffered disk reads: 84 MB in 3.05 seconds = 27.50 MB/sec # hdparm -i /dev/hda /dev/hda: Model=IBM-DPTA-372050, FwRev=P76OA30A, SerialNo=JMYJMG37046 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs } RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=34 BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=1961kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16 CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=40088160 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120} PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 *udma4 AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-4 T13 1153D revision 17: 1 2 3 4 # hdparm -i /dev/hdb /dev/hdb: Model=WDC WD400BB-00CLB0, FwRev=05.04E05, SerialNo=WD-WMAAN1443364 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec SpinMotCtl Fixed DTR>5Mbs FmtGapReq } RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=57600, SectSize=600, ECCbytes=40 BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16 CurCHS=4047/16/255, CurSects=16511760, LBA=yes, LBAsects=78165360 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120} PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 *udma4 udma5 AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled Drive conforms to: device does not report version: En gros, un IBM 40 Go et un Western Digital 60Go. Et l'IBM va bientôt avoir 5 ans, avec une utilisation quasi-serveur ! Je suis vachement impressionné, c'est pas de la merde, surtout que mon appart c'est loin d'être une salle serveur... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tramway Posted October 21, 2004 Share Posted October 21, 2004 /dev/hda: Timing buffered disk reads: 166 MB in 3.03 seconds = 54.72 MB/sec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuXXX Posted October 21, 2004 Share Posted October 21, 2004 Euh... hdparm c pas super pour les disques SATA sur contrôleur adaptec... bon, je le met quand même : $ hdparm -t /dev/sda/dev/sda: Timing buffered disk reads: 154 MB in 3.04 seconds = 50.63 MB/sec BLKFLSBUF failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device En gros, là ça me met les performances de un seul disque... Donc j'ai fait le test avec dd... $ time dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/damien/test bs=1000000 count=250250+0 enregistrements lus. 250+0 enregistrements écrits. dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/damien/test bs=1000000 count=250 0,01s user 1,64s system 76% cpu 2,164 total 250000000 octets en 2.164s =238Mo en 2.164s =110Mo/s bon, là c en écriture... en lecture, j'ai pas trouvé une bonne procédure de test... EDIT : ah oui, j'ai oublié...le type de disque... bon, évidemment hdparm marche pas... Donc 2 disques dur Hitachi 7K250, 8Mo de cache, 7200rpm, 160Go sur une carte SATA raid adaptec 2410SA ... en raid0 Je vous redis quand je serait passé en raid5 (dès que mon disque sera revenu du SAV, à la fin de la semaine...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fester Posted October 21, 2004 Share Posted October 21, 2004 voilà pour mon cas : /dev/hda: Timing buffered disk reads: 170 MB in 3.03 seconds = 56.13 MB/sec /dev/hdc: Timing buffered disk reads: 170 MB in 3.02 seconds = 56.37 MB/sec /dev/hda: ATA device, with non-removable media Model Number: Maxtor 6Y080L0 Serial Number: Y2EZHBME Firmware Revision: YAR41BW0 Capabilities: LBA, IORDY(can be disabled) Queue depth: 1 Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 16 Advanced power management level: unknown setting (0x0000) Recommended acoustic management value: 192, current value: 254 DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6 Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns /dev/hdc: ATA device, with non-removable media Model Number: Maxtor 6Y160P0 Serial Number: Y463539E Firmware Revision: YAR41BW0 Capabilities: LBA, IORDY(can be disabled) Queue depth: 1 Standby timer values: spec'd by Standard, no device specific minimum R/W multiple sector transfer: Max = 16 Current = 16 Advanced power management level: unknown setting (0x0000) Recommended acoustic management value: 192, current value: 192 DMA: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5 *udma6 Cycle time: min=120ns recommended=120ns PIO: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 Cycle time: no flow control=120ns IORDY flow control=120ns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minimalist Posted October 21, 2004 Share Posted October 21, 2004 Je vais te battre Gauret : 48MB in 3.03 seconds = 15.84 MB/sec Ok, c'est un Hitachi 40Gb 4200 tours (un DD de portable, donc) Demain de tente la méthode de tuxx sur le raid 0... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_c_p Posted October 21, 2004 Share Posted October 21, 2004 Je fais un lot complet : [18:08][jcp@phoenix][~] > cat /proc/asound/version Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.7rc2. Compiled on Oct 20 2004 for kernel 2.6.9. [18:08][jcp@phoenix] [~] > /usr/local/sbin/lircd -v lircd 0.7.0-CVS [18:09][jcp@phoenix] [~] > su root Password: [phoenix][/home/jcp]$ hdparm -tT /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing cached reads: 1024 MB in 2.01 seconds = 510.04 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 174 MB in 3.02 seconds = 57.57 MB/sec [phoenix][/home/jcp]$ uname -a Linux phoenix 2.6.9 #1 Wed Oct 20 17:15:28 CEST 2004 i686 AMD Athlon XP 2400+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinced33 Posted October 22, 2004 Author Share Posted October 22, 2004 allez voici mes resultats hdd hitachi 120Go 8Mo cache /dev/hda: Timing buffered disk reads: 174 MB in 3.03 seconds = 57.51 MB/sec hdd hitachi 120Go 8Mo cache SATA160 /dev/sda: Timing buffered disk reads: 174 MB in 3.03 seconds = 57.43 MB/sec hdd Ecxelstore 60Go mis dans un boitier externe USB2 /dev/sdb: Timing buffered disk reads: 66 MB in 3.04 seconds = 21.73 MB/sec je ne pensais pas qu'il etait si lent celui la Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashen42 Posted October 22, 2004 Share Posted October 22, 2004 Salut, Voici le mien, avec un DD IDE de 80 Go /dev/hda: Timing buffered disk reads: 128 MB in 3.01 seconds = 42.47 MB/sec Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theocrite Posted October 22, 2004 Share Posted October 22, 2004 Je vais te battre Gauret : 48MB in 3.03 seconds = 15.84 MB/sec fermat:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing cached reads: 568 MB in 2.01 seconds = 282.59 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 6 MB in 3.00 seconds = 2.00 MB/sec Alors, c'est qui le meilleur ? Gericom (portable) de récupération transformée en serveur pour cause de matos pourri (impossible d'installer Xfree). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuXXX Posted October 22, 2004 Share Posted October 22, 2004 Le meilleur, c'est moi : hdparm -tT /dev/hda/dev/hda: Timing buffer-cache reads: 48 MB in 2.11 seconds = 22.75 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 6 MB in 3.09 seconds = 1.94 MB/sec ...disque dur 12Go sur un pentium100 avec 16Mo de ram (et encore, là c'est bien, je peux brancher le 850Mo si je veux faire pire...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minimalist Posted October 22, 2004 Share Posted October 22, 2004 Ne me forcez pas à sortir mon IBM 320 Mo du placard (en le mettant en raid avec le 540Mo, ça doit pouvoir faire des scores de fou) J'ai aussi un 80Go Seagate sur un K6/2 500 (le serveur) : 22MB in 3.09 seconds = 7.11 MB/sec ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tramway Posted October 22, 2004 Share Posted October 22, 2004 Ne me forcez pas à sortir mon IBM 320 Mo du placard (en le mettant en raid avec le 540Mo, ça doit pouvoir faire des scores de fou) J'ai aussi un 80Go Seagate sur un K6/2 500 (le serveur) : 22MB in 3.09 seconds = 7.11 MB/sec ! comment ça se fait que tu obtiennes des scores aussi faibles ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minimalist Posted October 22, 2004 Share Posted October 22, 2004 comment ça se fait que tu obtiennes des scores aussi faibles ? Je soupçonne la carte mère de gérer l'UDMA de façon catastrophique. La machine rame tout le temps, c'est assez attroce. Heureusement, elle va dégager dans la semaine, et j'aurai enfin des perfs acceptables. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theocrite Posted October 22, 2004 Share Posted October 22, 2004 Oui, enfin moi ce n'est pas une antiquité. C'est un portable gericom ADM XP 1400+ 50Mo de RAM :S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuxbubling Posted October 22, 2004 Share Posted October 22, 2004 Allé a moi bash-3.00# hdparm -t /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing buffered disk reads: 156 MB in 3.01 seconds = 51.90 MB/sec Seagate 120Go IDE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nonas Posted October 22, 2004 Share Posted October 22, 2004 Maxtor 1.2Go (ATA33) hdparm -t/dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing buffered disk reads: 26 MB in 3.10 seconds = 8.39MB/sec Il tourne pas trop mal ce vieux disque en fait Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L33thium Posted October 25, 2004 Share Posted October 25, 2004 Sapphire ~ # hdparm -t /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing buffered disk reads: 134 MB in 3.04 seconds = 44.10 MB/sec Sapphire ~ # hdparm -i /dev/hda /dev/hda: Model=WDC WD800JB-00ETA0, FwRev=77.07W77, SerialNo=WD-WCAHL3505420 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec SpinMotCtl Fixed DTR>5Mbs FmtGapReq } RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=57600, SectSize=600, ECCbytes=74 BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16 CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=156301488 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120} PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5 AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled Drive conforms to: device does not report version: * signifies the current active mode Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke98 Posted December 30, 2004 Share Posted December 30, 2004 deteration de topic.... au passage il est sympa ce topic pour avoir une idée des perf de ses disques durs faudrait pas le re- perdre une petite illustration de "le raid soft c'est bon mangez en" #hdparm -t /dev/md0 /dev/md0: Timing buffered disk reads: 332 MB in 3.01 seconds = 110.46 MB/sec #hdparm -t /dev/hda6 /dev/hda6: Timing buffered disk reads: 162 MB in 3.03 seconds = 53.51 MB/sec #hdparm -i /dev/hda /dev/hda: Model=Maxtor 6Y160P0, FwRev=YAR41BW0, SerialNo=Y46Y38TE Config={ Fixed } RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=57 BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=7936kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16 CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=268435455 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120} PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 AdvancedPM=yes: disabled (255) WriteCache=enabled Drive conforms to: (null): * signifies the current active mode Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poulpatine Posted December 30, 2004 Share Posted December 30, 2004 Un pti 60 Go sur mon portable bidule:/home/poulp# hdparm -t /dev/hdc /dev/hdc: Timing buffered disk reads: 86 MB in 3.00 seconds = 28.66 MB/sec bidule:/home/poulp# hdparm -i /dev/hdc /dev/hdc: Model=IC25N060ATMR04-0, FwRev=MO3OAD0A, SerialNo=MRG356K3GB6EGH Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs } RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4 BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=7884kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16 CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=117210240 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120} PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 *udma5 AdvancedPM=yes: mode=0x80 (128) WriteCache=enabled Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 3a: * signifies the current active mode Voilà :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sillage Posted December 30, 2004 Share Posted December 30, 2004 /dev/hda: Timing buffered disk reads: 120 MB in 3.01 seconds = 39.90 MB/sec /dev/hdb: Timing buffered disk reads: 152 MB in 3.01 seconds = 50.54 MB/sec voila pour moi :) le premier est un maxtor 740DX et le second un DiamondMax9+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinced33 Posted December 30, 2004 Author Share Posted December 30, 2004 tiens c'est marrant de revoir ce topic remonter comme ca je remet les miens depuis ma reinstall toutes neuves 160Go hitashi 8mo cache ata100 /dev/hda: Timing buffered disk reads: 170 MB in 3.03 seconds = 56.17 MB/sec debian:~# hdparm -t /dev/hde 120Go hitashi 8mo cache sata160 /dev/hde: Timing buffered disk reads: 174 MB in 3.01 seconds = 57.85 MB/sec debian:~# hdparm -t /dev/sda exelstore 60Go 3/2 branché sur boitier externe usb2 (on voit la difference) /dev/sda: Timing buffered disk reads: 68 MB in 3.02 seconds = 22.55 MB/sec debian:~# Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
modr Posted December 30, 2004 Share Posted December 30, 2004 bash-3.00# hdparm -t /dev/hda /dev/hda: Timing buffered disk reads: 104 MB in 3.05 seconds = 34.11 MB/sec bash-3.00# hdparm -t /dev/hdc /dev/hdc: Timing buffered disk reads: 48 MB in 3.13 seconds = 15.35 MB/sec bash-3.00# hdparm -t /dev/hdd /dev/hdd: Timing buffered disk reads: 62 MB in 3.02 seconds = 20.55 MB/sec je me demande si ce résultat est fiable ? queqlqu'un a d'autre test ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-rem- Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 oui c'est fiable. Tu peux toujours faire des tests à la main, mais bon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theocrite Posted December 31, 2004 Share Posted December 31, 2004 Lance le plusieurs fois. Moi ça me donne toujours les mêmes résultats. J'ai pas fait un taux d'erreur, mais àa doit tourner autours de 10%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.